. Karriere Management Team Ergebnisse für Wild- & Amp; Fischerei Biologen. In den Vereinigten Staaten. Büro der Landbewirtschaftung; Wildlife Naturschützer; Biologen; Wildlife Management ; Fischereiverwaltung. Vielleicht auf die Frage, was hätte getan werden können, um ihren Verstand zu verlassen oder das Ändern der Agentur pro-hochschulmitarbeiter, oder welche Faktoren beeinflusst haben Ihnen zu bleiben, die Befragten in beiden Gruppen zu ändern. Es wurde mitgeteilt, dass die beiden wichtigsten Faktoren waren mehr Personal und/oder Finanzierung und verbesserte Karriere Leitern. Andere häufig genannten Faktoren waren die folgenden: mehr Personal und/oder Finanzierung, eine Veränderung der geographi

• Bildanbieter: Book Worm / Alamy Stock Foto
• Bild-ID: RFTX5H
• Dateigröße: 7,1 MB (347,6 KB Komprimierter Download)
• Freigaben (Releases): Model - nein | Eigentum - nein
• Format: 1509 x 1656 px | 25,6 x 28 cm | 10,1 x 11 inches | 150dpi

Weitere Informationen

Dieses Bild ist ein gemeinfreies Bild. Dies bedeutet, dass entweder das Urheberrecht dafür abgelaufen ist oder der Inhaber des Bildes auf sein Urheberrecht verzichtet hat. Alamy berechnet Ihnen eine Gebühr für den Zugriff auf die hochauflösende Kopie des Bildes.

Dieses Bild kann kleinere Mängel aufweisen, da es sich um ein historisches Bild oder ein Reportagebild handel

. Career Management Team findings for wildlife & fisheries biologists. United States. Bureau of Land Management; Wildlife conservationists; Biologists; Wildlife management; Fishery management. Maybe When asked what could have been done to change their mind about leaving the agency or changing pro- fessions, or what factors would have influenced them to stay, respondents in both groups indicated the two most important factors were more staffing and/or funding and improved career ladders. Other commonly cited factors included the following: more staffing and/or funding, a change of geographic location, more higher-graded Biologist positions (technical special- ists), different supervisors, more recognition of BLM as being on an equal plane with other Federal agencies, increases in salaries, increased training/workshop at- Question 13. - Would you work for BLM again in the future? 58%. tendance, a change to the next BLM office level, and forced moves (reorganization or retributions). The "other BLM jobs" group felt an improved career ladder was more important than more support for the Wildlife Program, whereas the "left agency" group felt the reverse was true. The "other BLM jobs" group also ranked more staffing and/or funding and more higher graded Biologist positions as more impor- tant factors than did the "left agency" group. The "left agency" group felt a geographic relocation with BLM would have been a more important factor. A number of Biologists felt BLM was a good agency and would return (58 percent) if management were to improve, legal and regulatory policies were more consistently implemented, and the principle of multiple use was applied more equitably. 14. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.. United States. Bureau of Land

Stockbilder mithilfe von Tags suchen

• bookcen
• bookcentury1900
• b��chercollectionamericana
• heftnummer22