. Floristen Review [microform]. Blumenzucht. • - "W^'^'^' ff.}. MABCH 8, 1922 Die Floristen Review 25 L'HSHsasasHSHsasHSHSHSHSHSHSEsasHSHsasHSHSESEsasasasHSZSHSHSHSHsasHsasHsasasai'S HEUTE CANNAS 5 lESE 5 E52 S2 SHSH 5 HSa 5 HSHSHSH HSESa 5 5 H 5 5 H52 SESZ BSHSHSE 5 HSHSHSHSHSH HSESHSSSH ESHSH 5 5 "Ich habe die ersten inBtallment dieses Artikels, der in der Prüfung für den 2. März unter dem Titel erschienen, "Bei (Jagd der heutigen Cannas", behandelt mit cnnas aus der Sicht Ihrer (iilture, die Auswahl des Bodens, die meth - (ich. i-^ für Erfolg, etc. erforderlich sind, und de-scribed einige der besten Va

• Bildanbieter: Library Book Collection / Alamy Stock Foto
• Bild-ID: RRC1R7
• Dateigröße: 7,2 MB (215,8 KB Komprimierter Download)
• Freigaben (Releases): Model - nein | Eigentum - nein
• Format: 1208 x 2069 px | 20,5 x 35 cm | 8,1 x 13,8 inches | 150dpi

Weitere Informationen

Dieses Bild ist ein gemeinfreies Bild. Dies bedeutet, dass entweder das Urheberrecht dafür abgelaufen ist oder der Inhaber des Bildes auf sein Urheberrecht verzichtet hat. Alamy berechnet Ihnen eine Gebühr für den Zugriff auf die hochauflösende Kopie des Bildes.

Dieses Bild kann kleinere Mängel aufweisen, da es sich um ein historisches Bild oder ein Reportagebild handel

. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. •-"w^'^-'^'ff.}. MABCH 8, 1922 The Florists' Review 25 L'HSHsasasHSHsasHSHSHSHSHSHSEsasHSHsasHSHSESEsasasasHSZSHSHSHSHsasHsasHsasasai CONSIDERING TODAY'S CANNAS 5lESE5E52S2SHSH5HSa5HSESa5HSHSHSH5H5BSHSHSE5H52SESZ5ESHSH5HSESHSSSH5HSHSHSHSHSH"i THE first inBtallment of this article, which appeared in The Review for March 2 under the title, "Taking (Hunt of Today's Cannas, " dealt with cnnas from a point of view of their (iilture, the selection of soil, the meth- (i.i-^ required for success, etc., and de- scribed some of the best varieties in whites, pinks and bronze-leaved pinks. The discussion is here concluded and (I'iils with cannas of still other colors, tlic first of which is the yellow canna. I have long hoped that the day would iiome when we might have a good yellow cnnna. Possibly no variety did so much to popularize the canna as Florence Vaughan, which is classed as yellow, in spite of the fact that it is spotted with red. Although this variety should have been discarded long ago, it is still grown widely, and its production of bloom and brilliancy of color cannot be gainsaid. Many yellow cannas have been intro- duced since the advent of Florence Vaughan, but all of them have shown notable weaknesses. Either the petals are fragile and break in the wind, they sun-scald, or some other notable weak- ness is evident. When Buttercup was in- troduced I hoped a good yellow canna had appeared, and in some respects this was true, but on the whole it proved a disappointment. Queen Helen, the yellow King Humbert, which was introduced a few years ago has already become popular and possibly it is the best of the generally known yellow cannas today, but this variety is also speckled like the old Florence Vaughan, and is too fragile. Richard Wallace, which was introduced a number of years ago, is, perhaps, still the best solid yellow canna that is plenti- ful enough for general planting. Golden Gate. For a t

Stockbilder mithilfe von Tags suchen

• bookcentury1900
• bookdecad
• booksubjectfloriculture
• bookyear1912