. Die biologische Bulletin. Biologie; Zoologie; Meeresbiologie. 104 CHAS. W. HARGITT. Seine bekannten Gattung Gemmaria. Abb. 6, von Murbach die Abbildung von Corynitis kopiert, von ihm mit der ganz anderen Gattung der Name verwirrt, vermittelt ein gutes Bild der Medusa von Gemmaria gemmosa, im folgenden Abschnitt diskutiert werden. Ebenso, Abb. 7, von der Beschreibung der Schreiber des Gemmaria implexa, zeigt auch die markanten gemmarian Features. Mit diesen Zahlen und Fakten angeführt, die sich auf die Probleme, Es kann kaum Zweifel an der Con-clusions gezogen werden. S

• Bildanbieter: Library Book Collection / Alamy Stock Foto
• Bild-ID: RHKHTE
• Dateigröße: 7,2 MB (288 KB Komprimierter Download)
• Freigaben (Releases): Model - nein | Eigentum - nein
• Format: 1312 x 1905 px | 22,2 x 32,3 cm | 8,7 x 12,7 inches | 150dpi

Weitere Informationen

Dieses Bild ist ein gemeinfreies Bild. Dies bedeutet, dass entweder das Urheberrecht dafür abgelaufen ist oder der Inhaber des Bildes auf sein Urheberrecht verzichtet hat. Alamy berechnet Ihnen eine Gebühr für den Zugriff auf die hochauflösende Kopie des Bildes.

Dieses Bild kann kleinere Mängel aufweisen, da es sich um ein historisches Bild oder ein Reportagebild handel

. The Biological bulletin. Biology; Zoology; Marine biology. 104 CHAS. W. HARGITT. his well-known genus Gemmaria. Fig. 6, copied from Murbach's figure of Corynitis, confused by him with the very different genus of this name, gives a good picture of the medusa of Gemmaria gemmosa, to be discussed in the following section. Likewise, Fig. 7, from the writer's description of Gemmaria implexa, also shows beyond doubt the distinctive gemmarian features. With these figures, and facts cited bearing upon the problems concerned, there can hardly be reasonable doubt as to the con- clusions to be drawn. Syncoryne linvillei must be identified with the genus Corynitis; and the Corynitis of later literature must be identified with the genus Gem- maria of McCrady. It is therefore to be hoped that the long-standing confusion here referred to may be once for all removed by recognition of the facts as given. And while it is too much to anticipate that simi- lar confusion along kindred lines may be avoided entirely, the les- sons of past experience should count for something in rendering their occurrence less frequent, or of such persistence. Gemmaria.—Attention has been directed to the confusion of McCrady's Gemmaria with his very different genus Corynitis. A similar confusion has also been more or less current as to the relations of Gemmaria and Zanclea. The latter was instituted by Gegenbaur for a medusa found at Messina, and recognized by McCrady as having certain points of similarity to his doubtful Gemmaria, which he believed however, to be quite generically distinct from Zanclea. Having taken a medusa at Woods Holl during several years which is now well known as identical with McCrady's Gemmaria, and having kept these medusae at various times and for consider- able periods in the laboratory, I am convinced that they are beyond. Fig. 7. Gemmaria implexa. (Naples.). Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for rea

Stockbilder mithilfe von Tags suchen

• bookcentury1800
• bookdecade1890
• booksubjectzoology
• bücherubjekt