. Inverkehrbringen American wildlife management in der Perspektive. Wildlife Management. durch Viehbestand Organisationen beschäftigt, löschte die Prairie-wölfe und stark reduzierte die Zahl der Cougars und Bären. Nun, diese Missstände, die von wirtschaftlichen Interessen angeregt wurden, wurden durch eine wachsende öffentliche Wertschätzung der vielen Werte von Pred-ators und der Tierwelt im Allgemeinen überprüft. In den letzten Zeiten, Anforderungen für Alligator versteckt durch die Hersteller von Schuhen, Geldbörsen, und andere Lederwaren, angezogen Wilderer und illegale Käufer in die Sümpfe und Bayous von Süden verstecken. Ihre Aktionen fortzusetzen, werden

• Bildanbieter: The Book Worm / Alamy Stock Foto
• Bild-ID: RE3CNH
• Dateigröße: 7,1 MB (282,6 KB Komprimierter Download)
• Freigaben (Releases): Model - nein | Eigentum - nein
• Format: 1523 x 1640 px | 25,8 x 27,8 cm | 10,2 x 10,9 inches | 150dpi

Weitere Informationen

Dieses Bild ist ein gemeinfreies Bild. Dies bedeutet, dass entweder das Urheberrecht dafür abgelaufen ist oder der Inhaber des Bildes auf sein Urheberrecht verzichtet hat. Alamy berechnet Ihnen eine Gebühr für den Zugriff auf die hochauflösende Kopie des Bildes.

Dieses Bild kann kleinere Mängel aufweisen, da es sich um ein historisches Bild oder ein Reportagebild handel

. Placing American wildlife management in perspective . Wildlife management. employed by livestock organizations, wiped out the prairie wolves and greatly reduced the numbers of cougars and bears. Now, these abuses, which were stimulated by economic concerns, have been substantially checked by a growing public appreciation of the many values of pred- ators and of wildlife in general. In recent times, demands for alligator hides by makers of shoes, wallets, and other leather goods, attracted poachers and illegal hide buyers to the swamps and bayous of the South. Their activities continue to be curbed by aggressive state law enforcement and by bringing the alligator under the protection of a long-standing federal law that pro- hibits interstate commerce in wildlife products taken in violation of state laws. Thus, state and federal conservation forces were united in correct- ing the problem. From the standpoint of wildlife conservation, hunting must be judged solely on its effect on the species of animals hunted. The fact that many designated game species have increased steadily in numbers over the years, in spite of growing numbers of hunters with greater mobility, testifies to the effectiveness of scientific wildlife management. It also shows that the carefully regulated modern hunter has no long-term negative effect on the comparatively few wildlife species he pursues. This conclusion is based on research in many regions of the country. Therefore, with properly regulated sport hunting having no adverse effects, the decision of whether to hunt or not to hunt is a matter of personal choice. As with any large representative group of Americans, there are among hunters a minority who fail to abide by the laws and rules of sportsman- ship. These people, when their activities are not checked by effective law enforcement and the disapproval of the public — especially by sportsmen — can have undesirable impacts on local wildlife populations and create unfavorable reactio

Stockbilder mithilfe von Tags suchen

• bookcollectionamer
• bookcollectionbiodiversity
• bookleafnumber15